Because S’pore doesn’t have smart $$$

Singapore is home to 160+ VC firms managing a total of S$X billion. Fact.

Singapore has a successful venture capital industry. Myth.

The truth of the matter is, out of these 160+ VCs, only a handful are known to be open to the idea of investing in Singapore start-ups. The majority raise and park their capital here and invest in India and China, because as one venture capitalist once told me, “the deal flow quantity and quality is just so much better.”

Whoever mooted the idea of using US$1.3b to attract venture capitalists to set up shop in Singapore (in the form of EDB’s Technopreneurship Investment Fund) in the hopes of completing the Singapore entrepreneurship puzzle could have been somewhat misguided. Bring the VCs and you’ll get your start-ups? HMMMMMM…I salute your spirit and intent, but not your methods.

Our venerable business angels don’t fare much better on the scorecard either. Most of Singapore’s angels made their wealth from traditional businesses, such as real estate or banking and finance. To most entrepreneurs, these angels continue to maintain their relevance, and more often than not have a tremendous impact on their F&B-or-what-have-you enterprises. Yet anecdotal evidence suggests Singaporean angels, by virtue of their poorer risk appetite, lack of domain knowledge and insistence on positive cash flow, have missed out on one of the largest slices of the entrepreneurial pie – technology innovation.

And so our government resorts to market-distorting policies to plug the funding gap in the ecosystem, through a co-investment model (in the form of SEEDS funding and Growth Financing) for start-ups. I say these are market-distorting, because public funds are being used as a means to lower the risks borne by VCs and angels, to incentivise them to invest in 2nd-tier start-ups in Singapore. The really good start-ups will have no problems securing access to capital – VCs and angels would be falling over their feet to stake a claim on them before you can say return-on-investment. The question all of us should raise then, is: “Is this the best/most effective and impactful use of public monies?”

Ok ok ok…hold your horses. Not all SEEDS-invested start-ups were 2nd-tier. These funding certainly give entrepreneurs a shot at proving John Fischer (the F in DFJ) wrong about Singapore.

I don’t believe Singapore will ever produce a world-class start-up in the next 20 years.

- John H. N. Fischer at Stanford GSB, when asked after a class about why DFJ stopped investing in Singapore

I don’t need to extol too much on the mega-high returns that start-ups are garnering in the Information economy and increasingly so, in the Attention economy. Singapore has wasted a good 5 years chasing the shadows of the dotcom boom, and it’s about time our nation’s leaders start taking a serious look at this, with a different eye. Your MNC-courting ways won’t work when it comes to nurturing world-class SMEs.

At the end of the day, it’s all about the team behind the start-up. Court the talent, and all the capital and wealth of the world will flow into Singapore.

When that day comes, I will gladly close this blog down. Until then however, the rest of you will have to put up with my endless tirade.

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• Fatherly Talent!
• Room Can Only Take One Smart Ass
• Adjusting your game to the IQ of a woman